Loading...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 | Assembler Annotations ===================== Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Jiri Slaby This document describes the new macros for annotation of data and code in assembly. In particular, it contains information about ``SYM_FUNC_START``, ``SYM_FUNC_END``, ``SYM_CODE_START``, and similar. Rationale --------- Some code like entries, trampolines, or boot code needs to be written in assembly. The same as in C, such code is grouped into functions and accompanied with data. Standard assemblers do not force users into precisely marking these pieces as code, data, or even specifying their length. Nevertheless, assemblers provide developers with such annotations to aid debuggers throughout assembly. On top of that, developers also want to mark some functions as *global* in order to be visible outside of their translation units. Over time, the Linux kernel has adopted macros from various projects (like ``binutils``) to facilitate such annotations. So for historic reasons, developers have been using ``ENTRY``, ``END``, ``ENDPROC``, and other annotations in assembly. Due to the lack of their documentation, the macros are used in rather wrong contexts at some locations. Clearly, ``ENTRY`` was intended to denote the beginning of global symbols (be it data or code). ``END`` used to mark the end of data or end of special functions with *non-standard* calling convention. In contrast, ``ENDPROC`` should annotate only ends of *standard* functions. When these macros are used correctly, they help assemblers generate a nice object with both sizes and types set correctly. For example, the result of ``arch/x86/lib/putuser.S``:: Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name 25: 0000000000000000 33 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_1 29: 0000000000000030 37 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_2 32: 0000000000000060 36 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_4 35: 0000000000000090 37 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 __put_user_8 This is not only important for debugging purposes. When there are properly annotated objects like this, tools can be run on them to generate more useful information. In particular, on properly annotated objects, ``objtool`` can be run to check and fix the object if needed. Currently, ``objtool`` can report missing frame pointer setup/destruction in functions. It can also automatically generate annotations for :doc:`ORC unwinder <x86/orc-unwinder>` for most code. Both of these are especially important to support reliable stack traces which are in turn necessary for :doc:`Kernel live patching <livepatch/livepatch>`. Caveat and Discussion --------------------- As one might realize, there were only three macros previously. That is indeed insufficient to cover all the combinations of cases: * standard/non-standard function * code/data * global/local symbol There was a discussion_ and instead of extending the current ``ENTRY/END*`` macros, it was decided that brand new macros should be introduced instead:: So how about using macro names that actually show the purpose, instead of importing all the crappy, historic, essentially randomly chosen debug symbol macro names from the binutils and older kernels? .. _discussion: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170217104757.28588-1-jslaby@suse.cz Macros Description ------------------ The new macros are prefixed with the ``SYM_`` prefix and can be divided into three main groups: 1. ``SYM_FUNC_*`` -- to annotate C-like functions. This means functions with standard C calling conventions, i.e. the stack contains a return address at the predefined place and a return from the function can happen in a standard way. When frame pointers are enabled, save/restore of frame pointer shall happen at the start/end of a function, respectively, too. Checking tools like ``objtool`` should ensure such marked functions conform to these rules. The tools can also easily annotate these functions with debugging information (like *ORC data*) automatically. 2. ``SYM_CODE_*`` -- special functions called with special stack. Be it interrupt handlers with special stack content, trampolines, or startup functions. Checking tools mostly ignore checking of these functions. But some debug information still can be generated automatically. For correct debug data, this code needs hints like ``UNWIND_HINT_REGS`` provided by developers. 3. ``SYM_DATA*`` -- obviously data belonging to ``.data`` sections and not to ``.text``. Data do not contain instructions, so they have to be treated specially by the tools: they should not treat the bytes as instructions, nor assign any debug information to them. Instruction Macros ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This section covers ``SYM_FUNC_*`` and ``SYM_CODE_*`` enumerated above. * ``SYM_FUNC_START`` and ``SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL`` are supposed to be **the most frequent markings**. They are used for functions with standard calling conventions -- global and local. Like in C, they both align the functions to architecture specific ``__ALIGN`` bytes. There are also ``_NOALIGN`` variants for special cases where developers do not want this implicit alignment. ``SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK`` and ``SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_NOALIGN`` markings are also offered as an assembler counterpart to the *weak* attribute known from C. All of these **shall** be coupled with ``SYM_FUNC_END``. First, it marks the sequence of instructions as a function and computes its size to the generated object file. Second, it also eases checking and processing such object files as the tools can trivially find exact function boundaries. So in most cases, developers should write something like in the following example, having some asm instructions in between the macros, of course:: SYM_FUNC_START(function_hook) ... asm insns ... SYM_FUNC_END(function_hook) In fact, this kind of annotation corresponds to the now deprecated ``ENTRY`` and ``ENDPROC`` macros. * ``SYM_FUNC_START_ALIAS`` and ``SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_ALIAS`` serve for those who decided to have two or more names for one function. The typical use is:: SYM_FUNC_START_ALIAS(__memset) SYM_FUNC_START(memset) ... asm insns ... SYM_FUNC_END(memset) SYM_FUNC_END_ALIAS(__memset) In this example, one can call ``__memset`` or ``memset`` with the same result, except the debug information for the instructions is generated to the object file only once -- for the non-``ALIAS`` case. * ``SYM_CODE_START`` and ``SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL`` should be used only in special cases -- if you know what you are doing. This is used exclusively for interrupt handlers and similar where the calling convention is not the C one. ``_NOALIGN`` variants exist too. The use is the same as for the ``FUNC`` category above:: SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(bad_put_user) ... asm insns ... SYM_CODE_END(bad_put_user) Again, every ``SYM_CODE_START*`` **shall** be coupled by ``SYM_CODE_END``. To some extent, this category corresponds to deprecated ``ENTRY`` and ``END``. Except ``END`` had several other meanings too. * ``SYM_INNER_LABEL*`` is used to denote a label inside some ``SYM_{CODE,FUNC}_START`` and ``SYM_{CODE,FUNC}_END``. They are very similar to C labels, except they can be made global. An example of use:: SYM_CODE_START(ftrace_caller) /* save_mcount_regs fills in first two parameters */ ... SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_caller_op_ptr, SYM_L_GLOBAL) /* Load the ftrace_ops into the 3rd parameter */ ... SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_call, SYM_L_GLOBAL) call ftrace_stub ... retq SYM_CODE_END(ftrace_caller) Data Macros ~~~~~~~~~~~ Similar to instructions, there is a couple of macros to describe data in the assembly. * ``SYM_DATA_START`` and ``SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL`` mark the start of some data and shall be used in conjunction with either ``SYM_DATA_END``, or ``SYM_DATA_END_LABEL``. The latter adds also a label to the end, so that people can use ``lstack`` and (local) ``lstack_end`` in the following example:: SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL(lstack) .skip 4096 SYM_DATA_END_LABEL(lstack, SYM_L_LOCAL, lstack_end) * ``SYM_DATA`` and ``SYM_DATA_LOCAL`` are variants for simple, mostly one-line data:: SYM_DATA(HEAP, .long rm_heap) SYM_DATA(heap_end, .long rm_stack) In the end, they expand to ``SYM_DATA_START`` with ``SYM_DATA_END`` internally. Support Macros ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All the above reduce themselves to some invocation of ``SYM_START``, ``SYM_END``, or ``SYM_ENTRY`` at last. Normally, developers should avoid using these. Further, in the above examples, one could see ``SYM_L_LOCAL``. There are also ``SYM_L_GLOBAL`` and ``SYM_L_WEAK``. All are intended to denote linkage of a symbol marked by them. They are used either in ``_LABEL`` variants of the earlier macros, or in ``SYM_START``. Overriding Macros ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Architecture can also override any of the macros in their own ``asm/linkage.h``, including macros specifying the type of a symbol (``SYM_T_FUNC``, ``SYM_T_OBJECT``, and ``SYM_T_NONE``). As every macro described in this file is surrounded by ``#ifdef`` + ``#endif``, it is enough to define the macros differently in the aforementioned architecture-dependent header. |