Loading...
.. _split_page_table_lock: ===================== Split page table lock ===================== Originally, mm->page_table_lock spinlock protected all page tables of the mm_struct. But this approach leads to poor page fault scalability of multi-threaded applications due high contention on the lock. To improve scalability, split page table lock was introduced. With split page table lock we have separate per-table lock to serialize access to the table. At the moment we use split lock for PTE and PMD tables. Access to higher level tables protected by mm->page_table_lock. There are helpers to lock/unlock a table and other accessor functions: - pte_offset_map_lock() maps pte and takes PTE table lock, returns pointer to the taken lock; - pte_unmap_unlock() unlocks and unmaps PTE table; - pte_alloc_map_lock() allocates PTE table if needed and take the lock, returns pointer to taken lock or NULL if allocation failed; - pte_lockptr() returns pointer to PTE table lock; - pmd_lock() takes PMD table lock, returns pointer to taken lock; - pmd_lockptr() returns pointer to PMD table lock; Split page table lock for PTE tables is enabled compile-time if CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS (usually 4) is less or equal to NR_CPUS. If split lock is disabled, all tables guaded by mm->page_table_lock. Split page table lock for PMD tables is enabled, if it's enabled for PTE tables and the architecture supports it (see below). Hugetlb and split page table lock ================================= Hugetlb can support several page sizes. We use split lock only for PMD level, but not for PUD. Hugetlb-specific helpers: - huge_pte_lock() takes pmd split lock for PMD_SIZE page, mm->page_table_lock otherwise; - huge_pte_lockptr() returns pointer to table lock; Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything required is done by pgtable_page_ctor() and pgtable_page_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table allocation: slab uses page->slab_cache for its pages. This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. NOTE: pgtable_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl ========= page->ptl is used to access split page table lock, where 'page' is struct page of page containing the table. It shares storage with page->private (and few other fields in union). To avoid increasing size of struct page and have best performance, we use a trick: - if spinlock_t fits into long, we use page->ptr as spinlock, so we can avoid indirect access and save a cache line. - if size of spinlock_t is bigger then size of long, we use page->ptl as pointer to spinlock_t and allocate it dynamically. This allows to use split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_page_ctor() for PTE table and in pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. |