Loading...
CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code Nick Piggin, 2005 Context switch ============== 1. Runqueue locking By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in the context switch. See include/asm-ia64/system.h for an example. To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file (typically the one where switch_to is defined). Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. 2. Interrupt status By default, the switch_to arch function is called with interrupts disabled. Interrupts may be enabled over the call if it is likely to introduce a significant interrupt latency by adding the line `#define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW` in the same place as for unlocked context switches. This define also implies `__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW`. See include/asm-arm/system.h for an example. CPU idle ======== Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or clear it. 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt). 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be: local_irq_disable(); if (!need_resched()) { local_irq_enable(); *** resched interrupt arrives here *** __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); } 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter a low CPU priority. 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). arch/i386/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and sleeping idle functions. Possible arch/ problems ======================= Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): h8300 - Is such sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a). The H8/300 manual I found indicates yes, however disabling IRQs over the sleep mean only NMIs can wake it up, so can't fix easily without doing spin waiting. ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) |