Loading...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 | /* * SMP locks primitives for building ix86 locks * (not yet used). * * Alan Cox, alan@cymru.net, 1995 */ /* * This would be much easier but far less clear and easy * to borrow for other processors if it was just assembler. */ extern __inline__ void prim_spin_lock(struct spinlock *sp) { int processor=smp_processor_id(); /* * Grab the lock bit */ while(lock_set_bit(0,&sp->lock)) { /* * Failed, but that's cos we own it! */ if(sp->cpu==processor) { sp->users++; return 0; } /* * Spin in the cache S state if possible */ while(sp->lock) { /* * Wait for any invalidates to go off */ if(smp_invalidate_needed&(1<<processor)) while(lock_clear_bit(processor,&smp_invalidate_needed)) local_flush_tlb(); sp->spins++; } /* * Someone wrote the line, we go 'I' and get * the cache entry. Now try to regrab */ } sp->users++;sp->cpu=processor; return 1; } /* * Release a spin lock */ extern __inline__ int prim_spin_unlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* This is safe. The decrement is still guarded by the lock. A multilock would not be safe this way */ if(!--sp->users) { sp->cpu= NO_PROC_ID;lock_clear_bit(0,&sp->lock); return 1; } return 0; } /* * Non blocking lock grab */ extern __inline__ int prim_spin_lock_nb(struct spinlock *sp) { if(lock_set_bit(0,&sp->lock)) return 0; /* Locked already */ sp->users++; return 1; /* We got the lock */ } /* * These wrap the locking primitives up for usage */ extern __inline__ void spinlock(struct spinlock *sp) { if(sp->priority<current->lock_order) panic("lock order violation: %s (%d)\n", sp->name, current->lock_order); if(prim_spin_lock(sp)) { /* * We got a new lock. Update the priority chain */ sp->oldpri=current->lock_order; current->lock_order=sp->priority; } } extern __inline__ void spinunlock(struct spinlock *sp) { int pri; if(current->lock_order!=sp->priority) panic("lock release order violation %s (%d)\n", sp->name, current->lock_order); pri=sp->oldpri; if(prim_spin_unlock(sp)) { /* * Update the debugging lock priority chain. We dumped * our last right to the lock. */ current->lock_order=sp->pri; } } extern __inline__ void spintestlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* * We do no sanity checks, it's legal to optimistically * get a lower lock. */ prim_spin_lock_nb(sp); } extern __inline__ void spintestunlock(struct spinlock *sp) { /* * A testlock doesn't update the lock chain so we * must not update it on free */ prim_spin_unlock(sp); } |